| Title: | Assortative mating and within-spouse pair comparisons |
| Journal: | PLOS Genetics |
| Published: | 4 Nov 2021 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34735433/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009883 |
| URL: | https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1009883&type=printable |
Publication 4317
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
Spousal comparisons have been proposed as a design that can both reduce confounding and estimate effects of the shared adulthood environment. However, assortative mating, the process by which individuals select phenotypically (dis)similar mates, could distort associations when comparing spouses. We evaluated the use of spousal comparisons, as in the within-spouse pair (WSP) model, for aetiological research such as genetic association studies. We demonstrated that the WSP model can reduce confounding but may be susceptible to collider bias arising from conditioning on assorted spouse pairs. Analyses using UK Biobank spouse pairs found that WSP genetic association estimates were smaller than estimates from random pairs for height, educational attainment, and BMI variants. Within-sibling pair estimates, robust to demographic and parental effects, were also smaller than random pair estimates for height and educational attainment, but not for BMI. WSP models, like other within-family models, may reduce confounding from demographic factors in genetic association estimates, and so could be useful for triangulating evidence across study designs to assess the robustness of findings. However, WSP estimates should be interpreted with caution due to potential collider bias.7 Authors
- Laurence J. Howe
- Thomas Battram
- Tim T. Morris
- Fernando P. Hartwig
- Gibran Hemani
- Neil M. Davies
- George Davey Smith
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health