| Title: | Hypothesis-free discovery of novel cancer predictors using machine learning |
| Journal: | European Journal of Clinical Investigation |
| Published: | 11 Jun 2023 |
| Pubmed: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37303098/ |
| DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.14037 |
| URL: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/eci.14037 |
Publication 11554
WARNING: the interactive features of this website use CSS3, which your browser does not support. To use the full features of this website, please update your browser.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and better understanding of the risk factors could enhance prevention.</p>
METHODS: We conducted a hypothesis-free analysis combining machine learning and statistical approaches to identify cancer risk factors from 2828 potential predictors captured at baseline. There were 459,169 UK Biobank participants free from cancer at baseline and 48,671 new cancer cases during the 10-year follow-up. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, material deprivation, smoking, alcohol intake, body mass index and skin colour (as a proxy for sun sensitivity) were used for obtaining adjusted odds ratios, with continuous predictors presented using quintiles (Q).</p>
RESULTS: In addition to smoking, older age and male sex, positively associating features included several anthropometric characteristics, whole body water mass, pulse, hypertension and biomarkers such as urinary microalbumin (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.16, 95% CI = 1.13-1.19), C-reactive protein (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.20, 95% CI = 1.16-1.24) and red blood cell distribution width (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 1.18, 95% CI = 1.14-1.21), among others. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.81-0.87) and albumin (Q5 vs. Q1 OR 0.84, 95% CI = 0.81-0.87) were inversely associated with cancer. In sex-stratified analyses, higher testosterone increased the risk in females but not in males (Q5 vs. Q1 ORfemales 1.23, 95% CI = 1.17-1.30). Phosphate was associated with a lower risk in females but a higher risk in males (Q5 vs. Q1 ORfemales 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90-0.99 vs. ORmales 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.15).</p>
CONCLUSIONS: This hypothesis-free analysis suggests personal characteristics, metabolic biomarkers, physical measures and smoking as important predictors of cancer risk, with further studies needed to confirm causality and clinical relevance.</p>
5 Authors
- Iqbal Madakkatel
- Amanda L. Lumsden
- Anwar Mulugeta
- Ian Olver
- Elina Hyppönen
1 Application
| Application ID | Title |
|---|---|
| 89630 | Improving disease risk prediction and prevention |
Enabling scientific discoveries that improve human health